WABASH RAILWAY CO.

v.

BRIDAL

Citator

Cited By

• Scarborough v. Atl. Coast Line R. Co., 178 F.2d 253 (4th Cir. 1949)
  …Pacific Railway Co., 227 U.S. 296, 33 S.Ct. 273, 57 L.Ed. 518; Carpenter v. Erie Railroad Co., 3 Cir., 132 F. 2d 362, certiorari denied 318 U.S. 788, 63 S.Ct. 983, 87 L.Ed. 1155; Wabash Railway Co. v. Bridal, 8 Cir., 94 F. 2d 117, certiorari denied 305 U.S. 602, 59 S.Ct. 63, 83 L.Ed. 382; Bell v. Wabash Railway Co., 8 Cir., 58 F. 2d 596; Rademaker v. E. D. Flynn Export Co., 5 Cir., 17 F. 2d 15; American Railroad Co. v. Coronas, 1 Cir., 230 F. 545, L.R.A.1916E., 1095; Partee v. St. Louis & San Francisco Rai…
• McGRATH v. Zenith Radio Corp., 651 F.2d 458 (7th Cir. 1981)
  …ot to be presumed but must be made affirmatively to appear by the party asserting it ... every intendment must be indulged in favor of the validity of the judgment appealed from.” Wabash Ry. Co. v. Bridal, 94 F. 2d 117, 121 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 305 U.S. 602, 59 S.Ct. 63, 83 L.Ed. 382 (1938); see also, Berenter v. Staggers, 362 F. 2d 971, 972 n.2 (D.C.Cir.1966). It would be an abuse of our powers of appellate review to upset the judgment below on the basis of mere speculation. Amount Of Compensatory Da…
• Chicago Coll. OF Osteopathic Med. v. George A. Fuller Co., 719 F.2d 1335 (7th Cir. 1983)
  …g it ... every intendment must be indulged in favor of the validity of the judgment appealed from.’ ” McGrath v. Zenith Radio Corp., 651 F. 2d 458, 472 (7th Cir.1981) (quoting Wabash Railway Co. v. Bridal, 94 F. 2d 117, 121 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 305 U.S. 602 (1938)). Reversal due to error in instructions is appropriate only where “the jury’s understanding of the issues was seriously affected, to the prejudice of the plaintiff[ ].” Wilk v. American Medical Association, 719 F. 2d 207, 218-19 (7th Cir. 1…