KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN RY. CO.

v.

INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (20 total)

• Interstate Commerce Comm'n v. City OF Jersey City, 322 U.S. 503 (U.S. 1944)
  …e.” See also Koppers United Co. v. Securities & Exchange Commission, 138 F. 2d 577; Colorado Radio Corp. v. Federal Communications Commission, 118 F. 2d 24; Red River Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications Commission, 98 F. 2d 282, cert. denied, 305 U. S. 625. Various objections to the Price Administrator’s contention are made, such as that the evidence he proposed to offer was remote, or of no probative value, that the application to reopen did not conform to the Commission’s rules, that he became, alo…
• Nader v. Nuclear Regulatory Comm'n & the United States, 513 F.2d 1045 (D.C. Cir. 1975)
  …note 60, 367 U.S. at 408, 81 S.Ct. at 1535, 6 L.Ed.2d at 932. See also Crowther v. Seaborg, 312 F.Supp. 1205, 1234 (D.Colo.1970). . See text supra at note 26. . Red River Broadcasting Co. v. FCC, 69 App. D.C. 1, 5, 98 F. 2d 282, 286, cert. denied, 305 U.S. 625, 59 S.Ct. 86, 83 L.Ed. 400 (1938). See also cases cited infra note 91. . Id. See also Easton Utils. Comm’n v. AEC, 137 U.S.App.D.C. 359, 363, 424 F. 2d 847, 851 (en banc 1970); Spanish Int’l Broadcasting Co. v. FCC, 128 U.S.App.D.C. 93, 105, 385 F.…
• Mrs. Burton Joseph v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n, 404 F.2d 207 (D.C. Cir. 1968)
  …o. v. FCC, 100 U.S.App.D.C. 251, 255, 243 F. 2d 829, 833 (1957); accord, O’Neill Broadcasting Co. v. United States, 100 U.S.App.D.C. 38, 40, 241 F. 2d 443, 445 (1956); see Red River Broadcasting Co. v. FCC, 69 App.D.C. 1, 98 F. 2d 282, cert. denied, 305 U.S. 625, 59 S.Ct. 86, 83 L.Ed. 400 (1938). . 47 U.S.C. § 405 (1964). The letter of April 4, 1968, advised counsel: “That application was granted by the Commission on March 27, 1968 after full consideration of the questions of programming and concentratio…