RED RIVER BROADCASTING CO.

v.

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Spanish Int'l Broad. Co. v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n, 385 F.2d 615 (D.C. Cir. 1967)
  …1, 15, 107 F. 2d 212, 216 (1939); Woodmen of the World Life In [*625] surance Ass’n v. FCC, 69 App.D.C. 87, 99 F. 2d 122 (1938); Southland Industries v. FCC, supra note 14; Red River Broadcasting Co. v. FCC, 69 App.D.C. 1, 98 F. 2d 282, cert. denied 305 U.S. 625, 59 S.Ct. 86, 83 L.Ed. 400 (1938). . Aircraft & Diesel Equipment Corp. v. Hirsch, 331 U.S. 752, 767, 67 S.Ct. 1493, 91 L.Ed. 1796 (1947). See also Neisloss v. Bush, 110 U.S.App.D.C. 396, 401-402. 293 F. 2d 873, 878-879 (1961); Red River Broadcastin…
• Yankee Network, Inc. v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n (Northern Corp., 107 F.2d 212 (D.C. Cir. 1939)
  …devices is not for tbe pUrp0se of creating rights, or interests, however, but for protecting existing rights and interests. See Red River Broadcasting Co., Inc. v. Federal Communications Comm., 69 App.D.C. 1, 5, 98 F. 2d 282, 286, certiorari denied 305 U.S. 625, 59 S.Ct. 86, 83 L.Ed 400. In the same manner as the rights and equities of licensees are statutory in character so are their remedies.22 The Com [*218] mission is empowered by the Act to grant or deny an application for a station license.23 But th…

  ← 1 / 3 →
• Aeronautical Radio, Inc. v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n, 983 F.2d 275 (D.C. Cir. 1993)
  …appeal] have been heard, and then complain that he has not been properly treated.” Spanish Int’l Broadcasting Co. v. FCC, 385 F. 2d 615, 627 (D.C.Cir.1967) (quoting Red River Broadcasting Co., Inc. v. FCC, 98 F. 2d 282, 286 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 305 U.S. 625, 59 S.Ct. 86, 83 L.Ed. 400 (1938)). Om-ninet fits no exception to this rule that we can identify; had Omninet wished to contest an allegedly forced withdrawal, purportedly attributable to the cash contribution and/or the consortium requirements, it…