SCHEUER ET AL.

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (11 total)

• Spinelli v. United States, 382 F.2d 871 (8th Cir. 1967)
  …are searching for such items as secreted gaming equipment, the identity of which cannot be specifically ascertained. Calo v. United States, 338 F. 2d 793 (1 Cir. 1964); Nuckols v. United States, 69 U.S.App.D.C. 120, 99 F. 2d 353 (1938), cert. denied 305 U.S. 626, 59 S.Ct. 89, 83 L.Ed. 401. We believe a warrant describing the items to be seized simply as “bookmaking paraphernalia”, under the circumstances, describes with sufficient particularity the goods for which the police are searching. The items seized…
• United States v. Clancy, 276 F.2d 617 (7th Cir. 1960)
  …ized by virtue of the search warrant were described with sufficient particularity, can hardly be questioned in view of the authorities. Nuckols v. United States, 1938, 69 App.D.C. 120, 99 F. 2d 353, 355, certiorari denied, Floratos v. United States, 305 U.S. 626, 59 S.Ct. 89, 83 L.Ed. 401; Merritt v. United States, 6 Cir., 1957, 249 F. 2d 19; see also, Clay v. United States, 5 Cir., 1957, 246 F. 2d 298, certiorari denied, 355 U.S. 863, 78 S.Ct. 96, 2 L.Ed.2d 69. In the Nuckols case, supra, a search warrant…
• United States v. Klein, 565 F.2d 183 (1st Cir. 1977)
  …raphernalia." Id. at 794. See also James v. United States, 416 F. 2d 467, 472-73 (5th Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 907, 90 S.Ct. 902, 25 L.Ed.2d 87 (1970); Nuckols v. United States, 69 App.D.C. 120, 122, 99 F. 2d 353, 355 (1938), cert. denied, 305 U.S. 626, 59 S.Ct. 89, 83 L.Ed. 401 (1938). Perhaps more supportive of the government’s position is the language in this court’s decision in Vitali v. United States, 383 F. 2d 121 (1st Cir. 1967), which was followed by the Second Circuit in United States v.…