BIDDLE PURCHASING CO. ET AL.

v.

FEDERAL TRADE COMM'N

Citator

Cited By

• Great Atl. & Pac. Tea Co. v. Fed. Trade Comm'n, 106 F.2d 667 (3d Cir. 1939)
  …meaningless and unnecessary. The Circuit Courts of Appeals for the Second and Fourth Circuits respectively have passed upon this question in the cases of Biddle Purchasing Company v. Federal Trade Commission, 2 Cir., 96 F. 2d 687, certiorari denied 305 U.S. 634, 59 S.Ct. 101, 83 L.Ed. 407; and Oliver Brothers v. Federal Trade Commission, 4 Cir., 102 F. 2d 763. In the Biddle case, 96 F. 2d at page 691, the Court of Appeals of the Second Circuit states : “Congress must have intended that payments by sellers…
• Elizabeth Arden, Inc. v. Fed. Trade Comm'n, 156 F.2d 132 (2d Cir. 1946)
  …44 F. 2d 211, 215; and see 324 U.S. 726, 745, 65 S.Ct. 961, 89 L.Ed. 1320; Oliver Bros. v. Federal Trade Commission, 4 Cir., 102 F. 2d 763, 766-769; Biddle Purchasing Co. v. Federal Trade Commission, 2 Cir., 96 F. 2d 687, 690, 691, certiorari denied 305 U.S. 634, 59 S.Ct. 101, 83 L.Ed. 407; Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Federal Trade Commission, 3 Cir., 106 F. 2d 667, 673-678, certiorari denied 308 U.S. 625, 60 S.Ct. 380, 84 L.Ed. 521; Southgate Brokerage Co. v. Federal Trade Commission, 4 Cir., 150 F…
• Fitch v. Kentucky-Tennessee Light & Power Co., 136 F.2d 12 (6th Cir. 1943)
  …tatute prohibits payment of brokerage by the seller to the buyer or his agent or representative or controlled intermediary except for services rendered.” Biddle Purchasing Co. v. Federal Trade Commission, 2 Cir., 96 F. 2d 687, 691, certiorari denied 305 U.S. 634, 59 S.Ct, [*16] 101, 83 L.Ed. 407. “It is plain enough that the paragraph, taken as a whole, is framed to prohibit the payment of brokerage in any guise by one party to the other, or the other’s agent. * * * Paragraph (c) is a distinct and complete…