JULIUS KAYSER & CO. ET AL.

v.

ROSEDALE KNITTING CO.

Citator

Cited By

• Zara Foster v. The Atl. Ref. Co., 329 F.2d 485 (5th Cir. 1964)
  …55 F. 2d 196, 198, certiorari denied 329 U.S. 714, 67 S.Ct. 44, 91 L.Ed. 620. . See Blackburn v. Automobile Finance Co., Tex.Civ.App., 121 S.W. 2d 388, 389. . Arkansas Natural Gas Corporation v. Sartor, 5 Cir., 98 F. 2d 527, 530, certiorari denied 305 U.S. 649, 59 S.Ct. 243, 83 L.Ed. 120. . See Vernon’s Ann.Civ.St. art. 5527. . See Martin v. Amis, Tex.Com.App., 288 S.W. 431, 433. . See Hickok Producing & Development Co. v. Texas Co., 5 Cir., 128 F. 2d 183, 185; Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Johnson, 5 Cir.…
• Am. MFG. Co. v. Verplex Co., 180 F.2d 964 (2d Cir. 1950)
  …controversy was settled between the parties by negotiation. Under such circumstances, the mere existence of the interference gives no aid to appellant’s case. Julius Kayser & Co. v. Rosedale Knitting Co., 3 Cir., 98 F. 2d 839, 840, certiorari denied 305 U.S. 649, 59 S.Ct. 230, 83 L.Ed. 419. Since the fact of prior use invalidates the patent, it is unnecessary to discuss the other ground of invalidity taken by the district judge: lack of invention in view of the prior art patents. It will suffice to say tha…