HURT
v.
ZERBST, WARDEN
HURT
ZERBST, WARDEN
305 U.S. 656
Supreme Court of the United States (1939)
Caution
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Baker v. Hunter, 142 F.2d 615 (10th Cir. 1944)…authorities which support it. Dimmick v. Tompkins, 194 U.S. 540, 24 S.Ct. 780, 48 L.Ed. 1110; Mosheik v. Bates, 66 App.D.C. 318, 87 F. 2d 221; Hudspeth v. Mosheik, 10 Cir., 94 F. 2d 382; Demarois v. Hudspeth, 10 Cir., 99 F. 2d 274 certiorari denied 305 U.S. 656, 59 S.Ct. 360, 83 L.Ed. 425; United States ex rel. Steinberg v. Cummings, D.C., 14 F.Supp. 647, affirmed 3 Cir., 85 F. 2d 1022; Von Baden v. Hiatt, D.C., 47 F.Supp. 683; Smith v. Hiatt, D.C., 48 F.Supp. 747. Moreover, we are also of the opinion that…
-
In re Ripp v. Fleming, 242 F.2d 849 (7th Cir. 1957)…o late. His waiver had long been effective. Fairbanks Steam Shovel Co. v. Wills, 240 U.S. 642, 36 S.Ct. 466,. 60 L.Ed. 841; In re Realty Associates Securities Corp., 2 Cir., 98 F. 2d 722, certiorari denied Wohl v. Realty Associates Securities Corp., 305 U.S. 656, 59 S.Ct. 252, 83 L.Ed. 425. After defining the limitations and restrictions upon chattel mortgages in Sec. 241.08 of the Wisconsin statutes, the Act further provides in Sec. 241.11, that any chattel mortgage filed as required by Sec. 241.08 shall…
-
United States v. McGOVERN, 661 F.2d 27 (3d Cir. 1981)…action. Whatever validity this argument may have in other contexts, e. g., see United States v. Sonnenberg, 158 F. 2d 911 (3d Cir. 1946) (implied authority to endorse war bonds); Oquendo v. Federal Reserve Bank, 98 F. 2d 708 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 305 U.S. 656, 59 S.Ct. 251, 83 L.Ed. 425 (1938) (fraudulently induced authority to sign check); see also United States v. Carney, 328 F.Supp. 960 (D.Del.1971), aff’d per curiam, 455 F. 2d 925 (3d Cir. 1972); Russell v. Second National Bank, 136 N.J.L. 270, 55 A.…