BRYAN ET AL.

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Schaefer v. First Nat'l Bank OF Lincolnwood, 509 F.2d 1287 (7th Cir. 1975)
  …those who negligently facilitate fraud. The defendants have claimed that the tolling doctrine only operates against those who commit the fraud. They sought to find support in Bryan v. United States, 99 F. 2d 549, 552 (10th Cir. 1938), cert. denied, 305 U.S. 661, 59 S.Ct. 364, 83 L.Ed. 429 (1939), and Hayden v. Thompson, 71 F. 60 (8th Cir. 1895), both fraud actions. Bryan is no support because the fraud suit was dismissed upon the defense of sovereign immunity where the defendant employer was the United Sta…
• Burnham Chem. Co. v. Borax Consolidated, 170 F.2d 569 (9th Cir. 1948)
  …der Co. v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours Powder Co., 248 U.S. 55, 39 S.Ct. 38, 63 L.Ed. 123. Pashley v. Pacific Electric Co., supra; Kimball v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co., supra; Bryan v. United States, 10 Cir. 1938, 99 F. 2d 519, 553, certiorari denied 305 U.S. 661, 59 S.Ct. 364, 83 L.Ed. 429. Seafidi v. Western Loan and Building Co., 72 Cal.App.2d 550, 165 P. 2d 260; Strout v. United Shoe Machinery Co., D. C., 208 F. 646; Lattin v. Gillette, 95 Cal. 317, 30 P. 545, 29 Am.St.Rep. 115; Lambert v. McKenzie, 135…
• Archibald Kreiger and Claire R. Kreiger v. United States, 539 F.2d 317 (3d Cir. 1976)
  …at the United States could be charged with fraudulent concealment or even negligence because of the SEC’s failure to detect alleged violations of the federal securities laws. . In Bryan v. United States, 99 F. 2d 549 (10th Cir. 1938), cert. denied, 305 U.S. 661, 59 S.Ct. 364, 83 L.Ed. 429 (1939), the court dismissed a tax refund suit for want of a timely claim in a considerably more compelling situation. In that case the tardiness of the claim was allegedly caused, at least in part, by government auditors…