INTERNATIONAL LADIES' GARMENT WORKERS' UNION ET AL.

v.

DONNELLY GARMENT CO. ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• McCULLOUGH Tool Co. v. Well Surveys, Inc., 343 F.2d 381 (10th Cir. 1965)
  …art, and is entitled to protection as an inventor. Bewal, Inc. v. Minnesota Mining and Mfg. Co., 10 Cir., 292 F. 2d 159; Williams Iron Works Co. v. Hughes Tool Co., supra; Steiner Sales Co. v. Schwartz Sales Co., 10 Cir., 98 F. 2d 999, cert. denied, 305 U.S. 662, 59 S.Ct. 364, 83 L.Ed. 430; G. H. Packwood Mfg. Co. v. St. Louis Janitor Supply Co., supra. We think that, when measured by the foregoing rules, the Pringle device, as limited by the trial court, is not only novel but was not obvious and constitut…
• Battaglia v. Gen. Motors Corp., 169 F.2d 254 (2d Cir. 1948)
  …to the trial of an action on the merits. McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp., 298 U.S. 178, 56 S.Ct. 780, 80 L.Ed. 1135; Donnelly Garment Co. v. [*257] International Ladies’ Garment Workers’ Union, 8 Cir., 99 F. 2d 309, 316, certiorari denied, 305 U.S. 662, 59 S.Ct. 364, 83 L.Ed. 430 ; 28 U.S.C.A. § 380. Unlike the situation in Ward Baking Co. v. Holtzoff, 2 Cir., 164 F. 2d 34, 36, where we said that, “It is inexpedient to attempt to decide a constitutional question such as this in vacuo,” there were…
• Yankee Network, Inc. v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n (Northern Corp., 107 F.2d 212 (D.C. Cir. 1939)
  …rari denied, [*220] 305 U.S. 625, 59 S.Ct. 86, 83 L.Ed. 400. See United States v. Katz, 271 U.S. 354, 357, 46 S.Ct. 513, 70 L.Ed. 986; Donnelly Garment Co. v. International Ladies’ Garment Workers’ Union, 8 Cir., 99 F. 2d 309, 317, certiorari denied 305 U.S. 662, 59 S.Ct. 364, 83 L.Ed. 430; United States ex rel. Anderson v. Anderson, 8 Cir., 76 F. 2d 375, 378; United States v. Oregon & California R. Co., 164 U.S. 526, 539, 17 S.Ct. 165, 41 L.Ed. 541; Lau Ow Bew v. United States, 144 U.S. 47, 59, 12 S.Ct. 51…