HAYWOOD-WAKEFIELD CO.

v.

SMALL ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Valencia Ctr., Inc. v. Publix Super Mkts., Inc., 464 So. 2d 1267 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)
  …n it entered the lease was to make a profit, an intention frustrated by the tax rise; however, Valencia’s property can still be used for rental, the purpose of the lease. See Megan v. Updike Grain Corp., 94 F. 2d 551 (8th Cir.1938), cert. dismissed, 305 U.S. 663, 58 S.Ct. 1062, 83 L.Ed. 430 (1938) (lessee must continue to pay rent where object of contract, use of grain elevator, possible but tariff rise, anticipated when lease renewed, made use unprofitable); Lee v. Bowlerama Enterprises, Inc., 368 So. 2d 9…
• Hook v. Hook & Ackerman, Inc., 187 F.2d 52 (3d Cir. 1951)
  …o any particular portion of the United States, vests title to the patent in the transferee, even though the assignment purports to be a “license contract”, as in Heywood-Wakefield Co. v. Small, 1 Cir., 1938, 96 F. 2d 496, certiorari dismissed, 1938, 305 U.S. 663, 59 S.Ct. 54, 83 L.Ed. 430. See Crown Die & Tool Company v. Nye Tool & Machine Works, 1923, 261 U.S. 24, 43 S.Ct. 25, 67 L.Ed. 516; Doherty Research Co. v. Vickers, 10 Cir., 80 F. 2d 809, certiorari denied, 1936, 299 U.S. 545, 57 S.Ct. 9, 81 L.Ed. 4…