AMERICAN PERFIT CRYSTAL CORPORATION, A NEW YORK CORPORATION DULY AUTHORIZED TO TRANSACT BUSINESS IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
v.
METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA, A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1965-04-27
No. 64-887
Before BARKDULL, C. J., and CARROLL and HENDRY, JJ.
174 So. 2d 466 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1965) Positive Treatment
Cited by 10 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See: Evans v. Hillsborough County, 135 Fla. 471, 186 So. 193; Zweifel Manufacturing Corp. v. City of Peoria, 11 Ill.2d 489, 144 N.E.2d 593; Walker v. City of Biloxi, 229 Miss. 890, 92 So.2d 227.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Fla. E. Coast Ry. Co. v. Rouse, 194 So. 2d 260 (Fla. 1966)
    …471, 186 So. 193; Mills v. Mills, 153 Fla. 746, 15 So. 2d 763; Henderson v. Antonacci, Fla.1952, 62 So. 2d 5; Greene v. Alexander Film Co., Fla.1953, 65 So. 2d 53; State v. McInnes, Fla.App.1961, 133 So. 2d 581; Gleason v. Dade County, Fla.App.1965, 174 So. 2d 466; cf. 6 Fla.Jur., Constitutional Law, § 50, p. 310, n. 14. . Greene v. Alexander Film Co., (Fla.1953) 65 So. 2d 53; 1 Fla.L.Rev. 460. . Townsend v. Beck, 140 Fla. 553, 192 So. 390. Cf. Schaff v. Lynn, Tex.Civ.App. 1923, 253 S.W. 590, 591. . Genera…
  • Sarasota Cnty. v. Sarasota Church OF Christ, Inc., 667 So. 2d 180 (Fla. 1995)
    …polluted runoff. This special benefit to developed property is similar to the special benefit received from the collection and disposal of solid waste. See, e.g., Charlotte County v. Fiske, 350 So. 2d 578 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977); Gleason v. Dade County, 174 So. 2d 466 (Fla. 3d DCA 1965). Given the legislative declarations discussed above, it is clear that the Church properties receive a special benefit from the stormwater services at issue because a special benefit is received by all properties with impervious s…
  • Charlotte Cnty. v. Fiske, 350 So. 2d 578 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977)
    …ed as a “special assessment.” In view whereof, the judgment appealed from should be, and it is hereby, reversed; and the cause is remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent herewith. SCHEB and OTT, JJ., concur. . See Gleason v. Dade County, 174 So. 2d 466 (Fla.3d DCA 1965). . 168 So. 2d 192 (Fla.3d DCA 1964). . See South Trail Fire Control District, Sarasota County v. State, 273 So. 2d 380 (Fla.1973); and Fire District No. I of Polk County v. Jenkins, 221 So. 2d 740 (Fla.1969). . See n. 2, supra.…

Previewing 3 of 10 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw