VEAL

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Cent. Mexico Light & Power Co. v. Munch, 116 F.2d 85 (2d Cir. 1940)
  …far short of proof of the jurisdictional amount in controversy, not to speak of proof with the precisipn required by the McNutt, KVOS, and Kroger Grocery cases, supra. Compare also S. S. Kresge Co. v. Amsler, 8 Cir., 99 F. 2d 503, certiorari denied 306 U.S. 641, 59 S.Ct. 582, 83 L.Ed. 1041; Gibbs v. Buck, 307 U.S. 66, 59 S.Ct. 725, 83 L.Ed. 1111. The claim for intervention falls with the original action. Pianta v. H. M. Reich Co., 2 Cir., 77 F. 2d 888. The judgments are therefore modified to state that th…
• Hedberg v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 350 F.2d 924 (8th Cir. 1965)
  …a, 344 F. 2d 730, 733-34 (8 Cir. 1965). Hedberg, in support of his position, relies particularly on Zep Mfg. Co. v. Haber, 202 F.Supp. 847 (S.D.Texas 1962) and on our own eases of S. S. Kresge Co. v. Amsler, 99 F. 2d 503 (8 Cir. 1938), cert. denied 306 U.S. 641, 59 S.Ct. 582, 83 L.Ed. 1041, and Federated Mut. I. & H. Ins. Co. v. Sternheider, supra, 268 F. 2d 734 (8 Cir. 1959). Zep and Sternheider were suits to restrain a defendant for an alleged violation of a covenant not to compete. Kresge was one to res…
• Am. Brake Shoe & Foundry Co. v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co., 122 F.2d 454 (2d Cir. 1941)
  …95 U.S. 760, 55 S.Ct. 923, 79 L.Ed. 1702; American Brake Shoe & Foundry Co. v. Interborough R. T. Co., 2 Cir., 98 F. 2d 72; Manhattan Ry. Co. v. Central Hanover Bank & T. Co., 2 Cir., 99 F. 2d 789, certiorari denied Manhattan R. Co. v. Merle-Smith, 306 U.S. 641, 59 S.Ct. 582, 83 L.Ed. 1041; Murray v. Roberts, 2 Cir., 103 F. 2d 889; Palmer v. Guaranty Trust Co., 2 Cir., 111 F. 2d 115; American Brake Shoe & Foundry Co. v. Interborough R. T. Co., 2 Cir., 112 F. 2d 669. This is a type of bond which the City…