LICHTENSTEIN ET AL.
v.
FLORIDA DRY CLEANING & LAUNDRY BOARD
LICHTENSTEIN ET AL.
FLORIDA DRY CLEANING & LAUNDRY BOARD
306 U.S. 666
Supreme Court of the United States (1939)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Heiner v. Gwinner, 114 F.2d 723 (3d Cir. 1940)…ee Commissioner v. Liberty Bank & Trust Co., 6 Cir., 59 F. 2d 320; Chatham Phenix Nat. Bank & Trust Co. v. Helvering, 66 App.D.C. 330, 87 F. 2d 547. Contra: Santa Monica Mountain Park Co. v. United States, 9 Cir., 99 F. 2d 450 certiorari dismissed, 306 U.S. 666, 59 S.Ct. 647, 83 L.Ed. 1062 and comment in United States v. Beckman, 3 Cir., 104 F. 2d 260, 264, McMillan v. United States, Ct.Cl., 18 F.Supp. 853.…
-
Korte v. United States, 260 F.2d 633 (9th Cir. 1958)…calls for resort to every source of interpretative assistance, Santa Monica Mountain Park Co. v. United States, 9 Cir., 99 F. 2d 450, affirming D.C., 20 F.Supp. 209, certiorari granted 306 U.S. 624, 50 S.Ct. 583, 83 L.Ed. 1029, certiorari dismissed 306 U.S. 666, 59 S.Ct. 647, 83 L.Ed. 1062. The intent of Congress with respect to Section 6 (m) of the Act is made clear by examining the predecessor statute, the Act of November 13, 1942, 56 Stats. 1018, which reads as follows: “No individual who has been con…