EX PARTE HARMON METZ WALEY; AND EX PARTE JOHN F. STROTHERS

Citator

Cited By (43 total)

• Henderson v. State ex rel. LEE, 65 So. 2d 22 (Fla. 1953)
  …325 U.S. 538, 65 S.Ct. 1373, 89 L.Ed. 1782.' “ * * * Congress * * * saw fit to regulate labor relations to the full extent of its constitutional power under the Commerce Clause, National Labor Relations Board v. Fainblatt, 1939, 306 U.S. 601, 607, 307 U.S. 609, 59 S.Ct. 668, 672, 83 L.Ed. 1014 [1019]. Ever since the question was fully argued and decided in Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 1938, 305 U.S. 197, 59 S.Ct. 206, 83 L.Ed. 126, it has been clear that federal labor legisla…
• Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Phœnix Mut. Life Ins. Co., 167 F.2d 983 (7th Cir. 1948)
  …oard v. Bradford Dyeing Associaton, supra, 310 U. S. at page 326, 60 S.Ct. 918; Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 305 U.S. 197, 222, 59 S.Ct. 206, 83 L.Ed. 126; National Labor Relations Board v. Fainblatt, 306 U.S. 601, 608, 307 U.S. 609, 59 S.Ct. 668, 83 L.Ed. 1014; National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp., 301 U.S. 1, 43, 57 S.Ct. 615, 81 L.Ed. 893, 108 A.L.R. 1352. The Board here properly concluded: “The activities of the respondent * * * occurring in conn…
• Hoffman v. Beer Drivers & Salesmen's Local Union NO. 888, 536 F.2d 1268 (9th Cir. 1976)
  …ing any intention of Congress to make the operation of the Act depend on any particular volume of commerce affected more than that to which courts would apply the maxim de minimis.” [National] Labor [Relations] Board v. Fainblatt, 306 U.S. 601, 607, 307 U.S. 609 [59 S.Ct. 668, 83 L.Ed. 1014]; see also, [National] Labor [Relations] Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp., 301 U.S. 1 [57 S.Ct. 615, 81 L.Ed.2d 893]. It may very well be that the business of each retailer taken alone had a relatively small impact…