MISSISSIPPI EX REL. RICE, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ET AL.
v.
UNITED STATES ET AL.
MISSISSIPPI EX REL. RICE, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ET AL.
UNITED STATES ET AL.
307 U.S. 610
Supreme Court of the United States (1939)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:
The decree is affirmed. Interstate Commerce Comm’n v. Union Pacific R. Co., 222 U. S. 541, 547-548; Los Angeles Switching Case, 234 U. S. 294, 311-312; United States v. American Tin Plate Co., 301 U. S. 402, 411.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Pub. Serv. Comm'n of Utah v. United States, 356 U.S. 421 (U.S. 1958)…et a single rate no [*443] matter what the length of haul. In spite of this evidence indicating that at least one factor underlying costs favored intrastate traffic, the Court upheld the Commission’s order. Mississippi ex rel. Rice v. United States, 307 U. S. 610, concerned intrastate rates on sand, gravel, fertilizer, and fertilizer materials. This Court affirmed the District Court per curiam, citing cases to the effect that the Commission’s orders would be sustained when supported by substantial evidence.…
Authorities Cited
- Interstate Commerce Comm'n v. Union Pac. R.R. Co., 222 U.S. 541 (U.S. 1912)
- The Los Angeles Switching Case, 234 U.S. 294 (U.S. 1914)
- United States v. Am. Sheet & TIN Plate Co., 301 U.S. 402 (U.S. 1937)