CARRUTHERS ET AL.

v.

REED, KEEPER

Citator

Cited By (35 total)

• United States v. Elliott Kahaner, 317 F.2d 459 (2d Cir. 1963)
  …asked to accept Moore’s grand jury testimony rather than what he said at the trial. As to the first point, the showing of surprise met the rather modest requirement of such cases as United States v. Graham, 102 F. 2d 436, 442 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 307 U.S. 643, 59 S.Ct. 1041, 83 L.Ed. 1524 (1939); Ellis v. United States, 138 F. 2d 612, 616 (8 Cir. 1943); Weaver v.. United States, 216 F. 2d 23 (9 Cir. 1954); and Stevens v. United States, 256 F. 2d 619, 622-623 (9 Cir. 1958). On the second point, the cour…
• Ross v. United States, 349 F.2d 210 (D.C. Cir. 1965)
  …t the plates be located and the actual printers of the illicit currency be apprehended. Another example occurs in cases of use of the mails in furtherance of a scheme to defraud. In United States v. Graham, 102 F. 2d 436, 440 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 307 U.S. 643, 59 S.Ct. 1041, 83 L.Ed. 1524 (1939), an immediate arrest might have frustrated the entire enforcement effort. Other instances will come to mind where continued surveillance may be essential to proper law enforcement. How far and in what circumstanc…
• United States v. DE Sisto, 329 F.2d 929 (2d Cir. 1964)
  …, cert. denied, 268 U.S. 706, 45 S.Ct. 640, 69 L.Ed. 1168 (1925); and the ruling of Mr. Justice Van Devanter at the trial in United States v. Graham, stated in Morgan, supra, 62 Harv.L.Rev. at 194, fn. 39, aff’d 102 F. 2d 436 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 307 U.S. 643, 59 S.Ct. 1041, 83 L.Ed. 1524 (1939). The sanctioned ritual seems peculiarly absurd when a witness who has given damaging testimony on his first appearance at a trial denies any relevant knowledge on his second; to tell a jury it may consider the…