SLATTERY ET AL.

v.

ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO.

Citator

Cited By

• Morton Eisen v. Carlisle & Jacquelin & DeCoppet & Doremus, 391 F.2d 555 (2d Cir. 1968)
  …ve litigation resulted in the actual distribution of about $17,000,000. Over 85% of the claims were for less than $25 and refunds were made to more than a million people. See Illinois Bell Telephone v. Slattery, 102 F. 2d 58 (7th Cir.), cert. denied 307 U.S. 648, 59 S.Ct. 1045, 83 L.Ed. 1527 (1939). . As previously discussed, it would also be possible to order separate consideration of the question of damages. . See footnote 12, supra. . See Kaplan, Continuing Work of the Civil Committee: 1966 Amendments…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Sanders v. John Nuveen & Co., Inc., 554 F.2d 790 (7th Cir. 1977)
  …he compass of the mandate are thereby not precluded from consideration. Sprague v. Ticonic National Bank, 307 U.S. 161, 59 S.Ct. 777, 83 L.Ed. 1184 (1939). See also Illinois Bell Telephone Co. v. Slattery, 102 F. 2d 58 (7th Cir. 1938), cert. denied, 307 U.S. 648, 59 5. Ct. 1045, 83 L.Ed. 1527 (1939). Following that view we must next examine the other causes alleged by plaintiff and an additional approach urged by Amicus Curiae.6 Plaintiff asserts that judgment in his behalf may be sustained under § 17(a) o…
• Christoffel v. United States, 214 F.2d 265 (D.C. Cir. 1954)
  …777, 83 L.Ed. 1184; In re Sanford Fork & Tool Co., supra; Mason v. [*267] Pewabic Mining Company, 153 U.S. 361, 14 S.Ct. 847, 38 L.Ed. 745; Illinois Bell Telephone Co. v. Slattery, 7 Cir., 98 F. 2d 930; Id., 7 Cir., 102 F. 2d 58, certiorari denied, 307 U.S. 648, 59 S.Ct. 1045, 83 L.Ed. 1527; Ohio Oil Co. v. Thompson, supra. The Supreme Court mandate here pro-jd d. “ * * * It is ordered and adjudged by this Court that the judgment of the said United States Court of Appeals, in this cause, be, and the same…