IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPLAINT OF EDMOND C. FLETCHER

Citator

Cited By

• Gregg Cartage & Storage Co. v. United States, 316 U.S. 74 (U.S. 1942)
  …ontinuous operation from June 1,1935, until the hearing by the Commission on the application. We have, however, held to the contrary. United States v. Maher, 307 U. S. 148, petition for limited rehearing denied, 307 U. S. 649. Hoey v. United States, 308 U. S. 510; Lubetich v. United States, 315 U. S. 57. Appellants contend alternatively that the Commission should be reversed for refusing to hold that the applicant “had no control” over the cessation of operations. From October 15,1935 to December 31,1936,…
• In re Darwin Charles Brown, 454 F.2d 999 (D.C. Cir. 1971)
  …cussed in text supra at notes 16-21. . See FedJR.App.P. 9(b). . See note 2, supra. We distinguish, of course, cases wherein a disbarred attorney undertakes legal representation. E. g., In re Fletcher, 71 App.D.C. 108, 107 F. 2d 666, cert, denied, 308 U.S. 510, 60 S.Ct. 119, 84 L.Ed. 435 (1939); Bowles v. Laws, 59 App.D.C. 399, 45 F. 2d 669 (1930). In such eases the attorney acts in defiance of the order of disbarment, and so the contempt authority conferred by subdivision (3) of § 401 becomes exercisable…