CONNOR

v.

CALIFORNIA ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Bennett v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 113 F.2d 837 (5th Cir. 1940)
  …Board entered an order denying the motion to vacate the decision and-for rehearing. Here, petitioners citing, Tait v. Western Maryland Railway Co., 289 U.S. 620, 53 S.Ct. 706, 77 L.Ed. 1405; and Oklahoma Packing Co. v. Oklahoma Gas & Electric Co., 308 U.S. 530, 309 U.S. 4, 60 S.Ct. 215, 84 L.Ed. 537; vigorously insist that the judgment they got is. res judicata, and as vigorously that considered on the merits, the District Court’s-decision' and judgment was right, the Board’s decision and order was wrong.…
• Provident Tradesmens Bank & Tr. Co. v. Lumbermens Mut. Cas. Co. & George M. Patterson, 411 F.2d 88 (3d Cir. 1969)
  …, 1 A.L.R.2d 370 (3 Cir. 1947), cert. den. 334 U.S. 838, 68 S.Ct. 1495, 92 L.Ed. 1763 (1948); Cobb v. Clark, 257 F.Supp. 175 (M.D.N.C.1966), aff’d per curiam, 375 F. 2d 773 (4 Cir. 1967). See also Oklahoma Packing Co. v. Oklahoma Gas & Electric Co., 308 U.S. 530, 309 U.S. 4, 60 S.Ct. 215, 84 L.Ed. 447, 537 (1940). Thus, the majority’s motions as to the better rule of law, and decisions applying the law of jurisdictions other than Pennsylvania, are of secondary value, since our function is to determine what…
• Meredith v. City OF Winter Haven, 134 F.2d 202 (5th Cir. 1943)
  …nforcible by any court of final jurisdiction, it shall not affect or invalidate any remainder thereof, * * Snyder, Retrospective Operation of Overruling Decisions, Ill.Law Review, Vol. 35, page 121; Oklahoma Packing Co. v. Oklahoma Gas & Elec. Co., 308 U.S. 530, 309 U.S. 4, 60 S.Ct. 215, 84 L.Ed. 447, 537. Cf. Chicot County Drainage Dist. v. Baxter State Bank, 308 U.S. 371, 60 S.Ct. 317, 84 L.Ed. 329. “Brio [R. Co.] v. Tompkins has now settled this. We have two hierarchies of courts, the federal system an…