REAL ESTATE - LAND TITLE & TRUST CO.
v.
UNITED STATES

U.S. | 1939-10-09
No. 229
Mr. Justice Roberts and Mr. Justice Reed took no part in the consideration and decision of this application.
308 U.S. 539 Supreme Court of the United States (1939) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Carpenter v. Wabash Ry. Co., 309 U.S. 23 (U.S. 1940)
    …n for certiorari, directing our attention to this statute, and in view of the importance of the question raised by the amendment, we granted certiorari, limited to the question of the right of the petitioner to intervene in order to assert priority. 308 U. S. 539. For the present purpose, we may assume, without deciding, that the determination of the court below was [*27] correct upon the record before it and in the light of the law as it then stood. But it is our duty to consider the amended statute and to…
  • In re Chicago v. Scandrett, 121 F.2d 371 (7th Cir. 1941)
    …ion shall deem it necessary, the maximum compensation which may he allowed by the coicrt pursuant, to thb provisions of paragraph (2) of this subsection (c).” Warren v. Palmer, 310 U.S. 132, 60 S.Ct. 865, 84 L.Ed. 1118; Carpenter v. Wabash Ry. Co., 308 U.S. 539, 60 S.Ct. 102, 84 L.Ed. 454; Securities & Exchange Comm. v. United States Realty Co., 310 U.S. 434, 60 S.Ct. 1044, 84 L.Ed. 1293; Adair v. Bank of America, 303 U.S. 350, 58 S.Ct. 594, 82 L.Ed. 889; Wright v. Vinton Branch of Mountain Trust Bank, 300…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw