J. L. PRESCOTT CO.
v.
PROCTER & GAMBLE CO.
J. L. PRESCOTT CO.
PROCTER & GAMBLE CO.
308 U.S. 557
Supreme Court of the United States (1939)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Conan Props., Inc. v. Conans Pizza, Inc., 752 F.2d 145 (5th Cir. 1985)…Dwinell-Wright Co. v. White House Milk Co., 132 F. 2d 822, 825 (2d Cir.1943); Golden West Brewing Co. v. Milionas & Sons, Inc., 104 F. 2d 880, 882 (9th Cir.1939); Procter & Gamble Co. v. J.L. Prescott Co., 102 F. 2d 773, 780 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 308 U.S. 557, 60 S.Ct. 80, 84 L.Ed. 468 (1939). As affirmative defenses, the defendant must prove how it will be prejudiced by the plaintiffs unreasonable delay and implicit or explicit assurances. Bohart, 743 F. 2d at 326 n. 13; Environmental Defense Fund, 61…
-
David Sherman Corp. v. Heublein, Inc., 340 F.2d 377 (8th Cir. 1965)…Ct. 32, 90 L.Ed. 431, or, as has been said otherwise, “an ordinarily prudent purchaser”. United Drug Co. v. Obear-Nester Glass Co., supra, p. 999 of 111 F. 2d; S. S. Kresge Co., v. Winget Kickerniek Co., 96 F. 2d 978, 987 (8 Cir. 1938), cert. denied 308 U.S. 557, 60 S.Ct. 79, 84 L.Ed 468; F. W. Fitch Co. v. Camille, Inc., 106 F. 2d 635, 639 (8 Cir. 1939) . 4. Each case stands upon its own peculiar facts. Dietene Co. v. Dietrim Co., supra, p. 243 of 225 F. 2d. 5. Whether the similarity deceives or is likel…