CORN PRODUCTS REFINING CO. ET AL.
v.
LOFT, INC.

U.S. | 1939-10-09
No. 98
The Chief Justice and Mr. Justice Roberts took no part in the consideration .and decision of this application.
308 U.S. 558 Supreme Court of the United States (1939) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Lesnik v. Pub. Industrials Corp. (Davison, 144 F.2d 968 (2d Cir. 1944)
    …F. 2d 778, certiorari denied Aluminum Co. of America v. Baush Mach. Tool Co., 289 U.S. 739, 53 S.Ct. 658, 77 L.Ed. 1486; Loft, Inc., v. Corn Products Refining Co., 7 Cir., 103 F. 2d 1, 10, certiorari denied Corn Products Refining Co. v. Loft, Inc., 308 U.S. 558, 60 S.Ct. 80, 84 L.Ed. 469; cf. Simkin, Federal Practice, 3d Ed.1938, "587. But a change in the nature and the basis of the relief, so as to make the new proceeding independent of the old, would make new service of process necessary. G. & C. Merriam…
  • Lucking v. Delano, 129 F.2d 281 (6th Cir. 1942)
    …contract, the creditor was free to direct the application to be made. Van Sceiver v. King, 176 Mich. 604, 605, 142 N. W. 1069; Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. McCormick, 7 Cir., 102 F. 2d 305, certiorari denied Bele v. Reconstruction Finance Corp., 308 U.S. 558, 60 S.Ct. 90, 84 L.Ed. 469. The amount recovered under the settlement was definitely allocated by the contract to be applied to specific debts of the Detroit Bankers Company and its subsidiaries, and this allocation was confirmed by order of the Dis…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw