CALIFORNIA FRUIT GROWERS EXCHANGE

v.

NEW YORK, NEW HAVEN & HARTFORD RAILROAD CO.

Citator

Cited By (11 total)

• S. Pac. Transp. Co. v. Commercial Metals Co., 456 U.S. 336 (U.S. 1982)
  …tals continued to be primarily liable for those charges. Illinois Steel Co. v. Baltimore & O. R. Co., 320 U. S. 508, 513 (1944); New York, N. H. & H.R. Co. v. California Fruit Growers Exchange, 125 Conn. 241, 254-255, 5 A. 2d 353, 359, cert. denied, 308 U. S. 567 (1939). See also Louisville & Nashville R. Co. v. Central Iron Co., 265 U. S. 59, 65-67 (1924). It is perhaps appropriate to note that a carrier has not only the right but also the duty to recover its proper charges for services performed. Id., at…
• Bergeron v. Mansour, 152 F.2d 27 (1st Cir. 1945)
  …, as a defense to the action when brought.” Morality and justice form the basis for equitable estoppel and neither consideration nor legal obligation are required to support it. Robinson v. Commissioner, 6 Cir., 100 F. 2d 847, 849, certiorari denied 308 U.S. 567, 60 S.Ct. 81, 84 L.Ed. 476. Defendant argues that estoppel is predicated upon a promise sufficiently certain to understand readily what the promissor undertakes; that the promise must be expressed, and contain an offer of a specific sum of money.…
• Rena Kardulas v. Fla. Mach. Prods. Co., 438 F.2d 1118 (5th Cir. 1971)
  …L.Ed.2d 40; Syracuse v. H. Daust Manufacturing Co., 8 Cir. 1960, 280 F. 2d 377, 379; Pleatmaster, Inc. v. J. L. Golding Manufacturing Co., 7 Cir. 1957, 240 F. 2d 894, 898; Oliver Machinery Co. v. Gellman, 6 Cir. 1939, 104 F. 2d 11, 13, cert. denied, 308 U.S. 567, 60 S.Ct. 80, 84 L.Ed. 476. See generally 1 A. Deller, Deller’s Walker on Patents §§ 46, 50 (2d ed. 1964) 4 The date of invention cannot be carried back to that of the earliest mental conception. There must be a disclosure sufficient to enable one…