CARBO-FROST, INC.

v.

PURE CARBONIC, INC., ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Mech. Ice Tray Corp. v. Gen. Motors Corp., 144 F.2d 720 (2d Cir. 1944)
  …gainst an exclusive licensee. See Neenan v. Otis Elevator Co., 2 Cir., 194 F. 414; Crowe v. Oscar Barnett Foundry Co., D.C., 213 F. 864, modified 3 Cir., 219 F. 450; Carbo-Frost, Inc., v. Pure Carbonic, Inc., 8 Cir., 103 F. 2d 210, certiorari denied 308 U.S. 569, 60 S.Ct. 83, 84 L.Ed. 478; Matzka Corp. v. Kelly Dry-Pure Juice Corp., 19 Del. Ch. 359, 168 A. 70; DeStubner v. Microid Process, Inc., 121 W.Va. 773, 6 S.E. 2d 777. We think this license made the defendant an exclusive licensee though it is true t…
• Glenn v. Am. Sur. Co., 160 F.2d 977 (6th Cir. 1947)
  …t, excusable or otherwise, failed to caption the record in the name of the Collector who had filed the [*981] notice of appeal. We held in Toledo Edison Co. v. McMaken, 6 Cir., 103 F. 2d 72, certiorari denied, Toledo Railways & Light Co. v. McMaken, 308 U.S. 569, 60 S.Ct. 82, 84 L.Ed. 477, that while a Collector could expressly or by indirection waive the statute of limitations in a suit against him, he could not impart to such waiver the obligation which the statute, Title 28 U.S.C.A. § 842, imposes upon t…