ZEGURA

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Lapin v. Shulton, Inc., 333 F.2d 169 (9th Cir. 1964)
  …deemed to be a continuation of that action and ancillary to it. Pacific Railroad of Missouri v. Missouri Pacific Railroad Company (1884) 11 U.S. 505, 522, 4 S.Ct. 583, 28 L.Ed, 498; Zegura v. U. S. (5 Cir. 1939) 104 F. 2d 34, 35, cert. denied (1939) 308 U.S. 586, 60 S.Ct. 109, 84 L.Ed. 490; see also Hartford-Empire Company v. Hazel-Atlas Glass Company (3 Cir. 1941) 125 F. 2d 976. In Deposit Bank v. Frankfort (1903) 191 U.S. 499, 24 S.Ct. 154, 48 L.Ed. 276, it was held that relief from an injunction clearly…
• Klapprott v. United States, 166 F.2d 273 (3d Cir. 1948)
  …regard to the answer to the question whether such proceedings would constitute a suit against the United States, not to be brought without the Government's consent. Compare Zegura v. United States, 5 Cir., 1939, 104 F. 2d 34, certiorari denied 1940, 308 U.S. 586, 60 S.Ct. 109, 84 L.Ed. 490, (such proceedings require governmental consent); United States v. Haas, D.C.N.D.N.Y.1944, 58 F.Supp. 179 (same), with Jones v. Watts, 5 Cir., 1944, 142 F. 2d 575, 163 A.L.R. 240 (such consent is not necessary); United St…
• Block v. Block, 196 F.2d 930 (7th Cir. 1952)
  …Railway Co., C.C., 3 F. 772; Pacific Railroad of Missouri v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co., 111 U.S. 505, 522, 4 S.Ct. 583, 28 L.Ed. 498; Taylor v. Easton, 8 Cir., 180 F. 363, 368; and Zegura v. United States, 5 Cir., 104 F. 2d 34, certiorari denied, 308 U.S. 586, 60 S.Ct. 109, 84 L.Ed. 490. Defendant followed the statutory mode for removal by filing his verified petition therefor, with copy of the alleged process and the complaint attached thereto, and the requisite bond, all as provided by 28 U.S.C.A. § 1…