LEWIS-KURES ET AL.
v.
EDWARD R. WALSH & CO.
LEWIS-KURES ET AL.
EDWARD R. WALSH & CO.
308 U.S. 596
Supreme Court of the United States (1939)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Karn v. United States, 158 F.2d 568 (9th Cir. 1946)…, 469, 53 S.Ct. 698, 77 L.Ed. 1321 (on the function of the jury); Helis v. Ward, 308 U.S. 365, 60 S.Ct. 283, 84 L.Ed. 327. Cf. New York Life Ins. v. Brown, 4 Cir., 99 F. 2d 199, 203; Lewis-Kures v. Walsh, 2 Cir., 102 F. 2d 42, 44, certiorari denied 308 U.S. 596, 60 S.Ct. 132, 84 L.Ed. 499; Lowden v. Denton, 8 Cir., 110 F. 2d 274, 278, certiorari denied 310 U.S. 652, 60 S.Ct. 1100, 84 L.Ed. 1417; Pessagno v. Euclid Inv. Co., 72 App.D.C. 141, 112 F. 2d 577; United States v. Halliday, 4 Cir., 116 F. 2d 812, 8…
-
United States ex rel. MacBLAIN v. Burke, 200 F.2d 616 (3d Cir. 1952)…e been paroled. Not having been paroled, he could not begin serving the minimum part of his second sentence until he had served the maximum of his first sentence. Commonwealth ex rel. Lewis v. Ashe, 335 Pa. 575, 7 A. 2d 296, certiorari denied, 1939, 308 U.S. 596, 60 S. Ct. 132, 84 L.Ed. 499; Commonwealth ex rel. Lynch v. Ashe, 1936, 320 Pa. 341, 182 A. 229. In substance, petitioner claims that in 1933 he lost the right to apply for parole •of the maximum part of his first sentence. But he had the right to…