BRITISH-AMERICAN TOBACCO CO.
v.
FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF NEW YORK

U.S. | 1939-10-23
No. 378
308 U.S. 600 Supreme Court of the United States (1939) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • United States v. VON Clemm, 136 F.2d 968 (2d Cir. 1943)
    …court without its constitutionality being questioned. Uebersee Finanz-Korporation v. Rosen, 2 Cir., 83 F. 2d 225, 228; British Am. Tobacco Co. v. Federal Reserve Bank, 2 Cir., 104 F. 2d 652, 653, on rehearing 2 Cir., 105 F. 2d 935, certiorari denied 308 U.S. 600, 60 S.Ct. 131, 84 L.Ed. 502. And the same argument now made by the appellants was rejected by Judge Woolsey in Campbell v. Chase Nat. Bank, D.C.,S.D.N.Y., 5 F.Supp. 156, 172, affirmed, 2 Cir., 71 F. 2d 669, certiorari denied 293 U.S. 592, 55 S.Ct. 1…
  • United States v. Levy, 137 F.2d 778 (2d Cir. 1943)
    …iedly adopted it and given at least some portions of it validity under Sec. 3 of the Act of Mar. 9, 1933. Cf. British-American Tobacco Co. v. Federal Reserve Bank of New York, 2 Cir., 104 F. 2d 652, affirmed, 2 Cir., 105 F. 2d 935, certiorari denied 308 U.S. 600, 60 S.Ct. 131, 84 L.Ed. 502. They could not, however, sanction the penalty thereby imposed, since Sec. 3 clearly limited the Secretary’s authority in this respect to the penalty specified. On this view, therefore, appellant, when the ratification pr…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw