FULLERTON ET AL.

v.

PITTSBURGH

Citator

Cited By

• United States Steel Corp. v. Multistate Tax Comm'n, 434 U.S. 452 (U.S. 1978)
  …17, supra. State courts repeatedly have applied the test in confirming the validity of a variety of interstate agreements. E. g., McHenry County v. Brady, supra; Dixie Wholesale Grocery, Inc. v. Martin, 278 Ky. 705, 129 S. W. 2d 181, cert. denied, 308 U. S. 609 (1939); Ham v. Maine-New Hampshire Interstate Bridge Authority, 92 N. H. 268, 30 A. 2d 1 (1943); Roberts Tobacco Co. v. Department of Revenue, 322 Mich. 519, 34 N. W. [*469] 2d 54 (1948); Bode v. Barrett, 412 Ill. 204, 106 N. E. 2d 521 (1952), aff’d…
• Signode Corp. v. Weld-Loc Sys., Inc., 700 F.2d 1108 (7th Cir. 1983)
  …d. 819 (1931); United States Gypsum Co. v. National Gypsum Co., 387 F. 2d 799, 802 (7th Cir.1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 988, 88 S.Ct. 1184, 19 L.Ed.2d 1292 (1968); American Lecithin Co. v. Warfield Co., 105 F. 2d 207, 212 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 308 U.S. 609, 60 S.Ct. 175, 84 L.Ed. 509 (1939). Rather, Signode contends that as a business reality, once a tool is placed with a customer, that customer usually purchases strapping from the seller of the tool. Even though Signode denies tying the sale, of stra…