BERRY, ADMINISTRATRIX,

v.

MIDTOWN SERVICE CORP. ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Hall, 198 F.2d 726 (2d Cir. 1952)
  …t for contempts may be inflicted.” Ex parte Robinson, 19 Wall. 505, 510, 86 U.S. 505, 22 L.Ed. 205. See also Morgan v. United States, 8 Cir., 95 F. 2d 830; Berry v. Midtown Service Corp., 2 Cir., 104 F. 2d 107, 122 A.L.R. 1341, certiorari dismissed 308 U.S. 629, 60 S.Ct. 297, 84 L.Ed. 525; In re Gottman, 2 Cir., 118 F. 2d 425; Frankfurter and Landis, Power of Congress over Procedure in Criminal Contempts in “Inferior” Federal Courts — A Study in Separation of Powers, 37 Harv.L.Rev. 1010. . “It appearing t…
• Project B.A.S.I.C. v. Kemp, 947 F.2d 11 (1st Cir. 1991)
  …efore a person should be subject to punishment for violating a command of the court, the order should inform him in definite terms as to the duties thereby imposed upon him.”), cert granted, 308 U.S. 536, 60 S.Ct. 114, 84 L.Ed. 452, cert. dismissed, 308 U.S. 629, 60 S.Ct. 297, 84 L.Ed. 525 (1939). To be sure, the Secretary participated in an appeal of the 1989 Order, which arouses some suspicion that HUD may have thought the order applied to it. HUD asserts, however, that it joined the fray because it beli…