KOBILKIN

v.

PILLSBURY, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF U. S. EMPLOYEES' COMPENSATION COMMISSION, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (11 total)

• Freeman v. Hewit, 329 U.S. 249 (U.S. 1946)
  …the “use tax” cases: General Trading Co. v. Tax Commission, 322 U. S. 335; Felt & Tarrant Mfg. Co. v. Gallagher, 306 U. S. 62; Nelson v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 312 U. S. 359; Nelson v. Montgomery Ward & Co., 312 U. S. 373. See also Jagels v. Taylor, 309 U. S. 619, discussed in McNamara, supra, note 25, at 487.…
• Pillsbury v. United Eng'g Co., 342 U.S. 197 (U.S. 1952)
  …he holdings of the Deputy Commissioner and the Court of Appeals, as to the construction to be given the limita-, tions provision. This same question was before us in 1940 in Kobilkin v. Pillsbury, 103 F. 2d 667, affirmed by an equally divided Court, 309 U. S. 619. Petitioners contend that the word “injury” as used in the statute should be construed to mean “disability.” This contention is premised on petitioners’ conclusion that § 6 (a) of the Act, which provides that “No compensation shall be allowed for t…
• Cooper Stevedoring OF La., Inc. v. Washington, 556 F.2d 268 (5th Cir. 1977)
  …nd and occupational diseases, on the other. In this respect, our attention is called to Pillsbury v. United Engineering Co., 342 U.S. 197, 72 S.Ct. 223, 96 L.Ed. 225 (1952), and Kobilkin v. Pillsbury, 9 Cir., 1940, 103 F. 2d 667, aff’d 309 U.S. 619, 60 S.Ct. 465, 84 L.Ed. 983. In Kobilkin the Supreme Court affirmed per curiam, by an equally divided Court, the Ninth Circuit decision which sustained the finding of the deputy commissioner rejecting a claim filed when the employee’s disability developed more t…