OKLAHOMA EX REL. WILLIAMSON, ATTORNEY GENERAL,
v.
WOODRING, SECRETARY OF WAR
OKLAHOMA EX REL. WILLIAMSON, ATTORNEY GENERAL,
WOODRING, SECRETARY OF WAR
309 U.S. 623
Supreme Court of the United States (1940)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 84 L. Ed. 985 · 60 S. Ct. 725 · SCDB 1939-145 · 1940 U.S. LEXIS 912
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
[*623] Per Curiam:
The motion for leave to file a bill of complaint is denied by an equally divided Court.
Mr. Justice Murphy took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Oklahoma Ex rel. Phillips v. GUY F. Atkinson Co., 313 U.S. 508 (U.S. 1941)…a motion for leave to file a bill of complaint seeking an injunction against the then Secretary of War from proceeding with the construction of this project. The motion for leave to file was denied by an equally divided court. Oklahoma v. Woodring, 309 U. S. 623. Appellees are Guy F. Atkinson Co., alleged to be constructing the dam 'under a contract with the War Departmént; and Cleon A. Summers and Curtis P. Harris, who as attorneys for the government are alleged to have instituted numerous condemnation su…
-
Banco de Espana v. Fed. Reserve Bank of N.Y., 114 F.2d 438 (2d Cir. 1940)…56 S.Ct. 343, 80 L.Ed. 331; United States v. Belmont, 301 U.S. 324, 57 S.Ct. 758, 81 L.Ed. 1134; Guaranty Trust Co. v. United States, 304 U.S. 126, 58 S.Ct. 785, 82 L.Ed. 1224; United States v. Moscow Fire Ins. Co., 60 S.Ct. 706, 84 L.Ed. 1036, Id., 60 S.Ct. 725, 84 L.Ed. 986, affirming Moscow Fire Ins. Co. v. Bank of New York & Trust Co., 280 N.Y. 286, 20 N.E. 2d 758, by an equally divided court; 47 Yale L.J. 292 ; 49 ibid. 324; 51 Harv.L.Rev. 162; 31 Am.J.Int.L. 481, 675; 5 U. of Chi. L. Rev. 280. A bro…
-
Maltina Corp. & Julio Blanco-Herrera v. Cawy Bottling Co., Inc., 462 F.2d 1021 (5th Cir. 1972)…6 U.S. at 447, 84 S.Ct. 923, 950, 11 L.Ed.2d at 834 (dissenting opinion of Mr. Justice White), citing, e. g., Moscow Fire Ins. Co. v. Bank of New York, 280 N.Y. 286, 20 N.E. 2d 758, aff’d sub nom. United States v. Moscow Fire Ins. Co., 309 U.S. 624, 60 S.Ct. 725, 84 L.Ed. 986.3 [*1026] We also accept the proposition, not seriously questioned in recent years, that “trademarks registered in this country are generally deemed to have a local identity — and situs — apart from the foreign manufacturer.” F. Palici…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence