UNITED STATES

v.

MOSCOW FIRE INSURANCE CO. ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Hines v. Davidowitz, 312 U.S. 52 (U.S. 1941)
  …279 U. S. 47, 52; Todok v. Union State Bank, 281 U. S. 449, 454; Santovincenzo v. Egan, 284 U. S. 30, 40; United States v. Belmont, 301 U. S. 324, 331 (but compare the affirmance by an equally divided Court in United States v. Moscow Fire Ins. Co., 309 U. S. 624); Kelly v. Washington, 302 U. S. 1, 10, 11; Maurer v. Hamilton, 309 U. S. 598, 604; Bacardi Corporation v. Domenech, 311 U. S. 150, 157, 167. Cf. Savage v. Jones, 225 U. S. 501, 533: “For when the question is whether a Federal act overrides a state…
• Banco Nacional de Cuba v. Sabbatino, 376 U.S. 398 (U.S. 1964)
  …discriminatory confiscatory decrees). See also West Rand Central Gold Mining Co. v. The King, [1905] 2 K. B. 391. Moscow Fire Ins. Co. v. Bank of New York, 280 N. Y. 286, 20 N. E. 2d 758 (1939), aff’d sub nom. United States v. Moscow Fire Ins. Co., 309 U. S. 624; Vladikavkazsky B. Co. v. New York Trust [*448] Co., 263 N. Y. 369, 189 N. E. 456; Plesch v. Banque Nationale de la Republique D’Haiti, 273 App. Div. 224, 77 N. Y. S. 2d 43, aff’d, 298 N. Y. 573, 81 N. E. 2d 106; Bollack v. Societe Generale, 263 App…
• United States v. Pink, 315 U.S. 203 (U.S. 1942)
  …he complaint “on the merits,” citing only the Moscow case in support of its action. On September 2, 1939, a petition for certiorari in the Moscow case was filed in this Court. The judgment in that case was affirmed here by an equally divided Court. 309 U. S. 624. Subsequently, the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York affirmed, without opinion, the order of dismissal in the instant case. The Court of Appeals affirmed with a per curiam opinion (284 N. Y. 555, 32 N. E. 2d 552) which, after notin…