AMERICAN MANUFACTURING CO.
v.
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
AMERICAN MANUFACTURING CO.
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
309 U.S. 629
Supreme Court of the United States (1940)
Caution
Cited by 37 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:
The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. Section 2 (g) (3) of the order of the Circuit Court of Appeals is modified so as to read as follows:
“(3) that the individual contracts'of employment entered into between the respondent and some of its employees were made by the respondent in violation of the National Labor Relations Act; and that the respondent will no longer offer, solicit, enter into, continue, enforce, or attempt to enforce such contracts with its employees; but this is without prejudice to the assertion by the employees of any legal rights they may have acquired under such contracts.”
As so modified the order is affirmed. National Licorice Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, ante, p. 350. Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas are of the opinion that the order should be affirmed without modification.
Mr. Thomas F. Magner for petitioner. Solicitor General Biddle' and Mr. Charles Fahy for respondent.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (35 total)
-
Cellos Harrison v. State, 152 Fla. 86 (Fla. 1942)…from secret and dictatorial proceedings have almost always been the poor, the ignorant, the numerically weak, the friendless, and the powerless.” See Ziang Sun Wan v. United States, 266 U. S. 1, 14, 45 S. Ct. 1, 3, 69 L. Ed. 131; Canty v. Alabama, 309 U. S. 629, 60 S. Ct. 612, 84 L. Ed. 988; Lomax v. Texas, 313 U. S. 544, 61 S. Ct. 956, 85 L. Ed. 1511; Vernon v. Alabama, 313 U. S. 547, 61 S. Ct. 1092, 85 L. Ed. 1513. The voluntariness of a confession was .before this Court in the case of Simon, a Slave, v…
-
Lawton v. State, 152 Fla. 821 (Fla. 1943)…from secret and dictatorial proceedings have almost always been the poor, the ignorant, the numerically weak, the friendless, and the powerless.” See: Ziang Sun Wan v. United States, 266 U.S. 1, 14, 45 S. Ct. 1, 3, 69 L. Ed. 131; Canty v. Alabama, 309 U.S. 629, 60 S. Ct. 612, 84 L. Ed. 988; Lomax v. Texas, 313 U.S. 544, 61 S. Ct. 956, 85 L. Ed. 1511; Vernon v. Alabama, 313 U.S. 547, 61 S. Ct. 1092, 85 L. Ed. 1513. The State failed to establish the voluntariness of the alleged confession beyond all reason…
-
Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (U.S. 1966)…lems, 3 U. Chi. L. Rev. 345, 357 (1936). See also Foote, Law and Police Practice: Safeguards in the Law of Arrest, 52 Nw. U. L. Rev. 16 (1957). Brown v. Mississippi, 297 U. S. 278 (1936); Chambers v. Florida, 309 U. S. 227 (1940); Canty v. Alabama, 309 U. S. 629 (1940); White v. Texas, 310 U. S. 530 (1940); Vernon v. Alabama, 313 U. S. 547 (1941); Ward v. Texas, 316 U. S. 547 (1942); Ashcraft v. Tennessee, 322 U. S. 143 (1944); Malinski v. New York, 324 U. S. 401 (1945); Leyra v. Denno, 347 U. S. 556 (1954)…
Previewing 3 of 35 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence