WHITE
v.
TEXAS

U.S. | 1940-03-25
No. 87
309 U.S. 631 Supreme Court of the United States (1940) Positive Treatment
Cited by 5 cases

Per_curiam
Per Curiam:

Per Curiam:

The motion for leave .to file a petition for rehearing is granted, and the petition for rehearing is also granted. The order entered November 13, 1939, 308 U. S. 608, is vacated. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The petition for writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment is reversed. Chambers v. Florida, ante, p. 227; Canty v. Alabama, ante, p. 629. The mandate is ordered to issue forthwith.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Watts v. Indiana, 338 U.S. 49 (U.S. 1949)
    …Malinski v. New York, 324 U. S. 401; Ashcraft v. Tennessee, 322 U. S. 143; Ward v. Texas, 316 U. S. 547; Lomax v. Texas, 313 U. S. 544; Vernon v. Alabama, 313 U. S. 547; White v. Texas, 310 U. S. 530; Canty v. Alabama, 309 U. S. 629; White v. Texas, 309 U. S. 631; Chambers v. Florida, 309 U. S. 227; Brown v. Mississippi, 297 U. S. 278; and see Ashcraft v. Tennessee, 327 U. S. 274. (13) Confession was found to have been procured under circumstances not violative of the Due Process Clause in Lyons v. Oklahoma…
  • White v. Texas, 310 U.S. 530 (U.S. 1940)
    …sentence resulted from proceedings in which the State had utilized an alleged confession in violation of the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. March 25, 1940, we granted certiorari, and reversed the judgment of the state court, [*531] 309 U. S. 631, upon authority of Chambers v. Florida, 309 U. S. 227, and Canty v. Alabama, 309 U. S. 629. The case is before us now on the State’s petition for rehearing.2 Erom the first offer of the alleged confession in evidence at the trial, petitioner has ch…
  • LEE v. Mississippi, 332 U.S. 742 (U.S. 1948)
    …swers did not amount to a voluntary confession. But in the absence of the complete record, we express no opinion on the matter. Brown v. Mississippi, 297 U. S. 278; Chambers v. Florida, 309 U. S. 227; Canty v. Alabama, 309 U. S. 629; White v. Texas, 309 U. S. 631, 310 U. S. 530; Lomax v. Texas, 313 U. S. 544; Vernon v. Alabama, 313 U. S. 547; Lisenba v. California, 314 U. S. 219; Ward v. Texas, 316 U. S. 547; Ashcraft v. Tennessee, 322 U. S. 143, 327 U. S. 274; Lyons v. Oklahoma, 322 U. S. 596; Malinski v. N…

Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw