A. M. KLEMM & SON
v.
WINTER HAVEN ET AL.

U.S. | 1940-04-08
No. 823
309 U.S. 638 Supreme Court of the United States (1940) Caution
Cited by 14 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:

Per Curiam:

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Central Land Co v. Laidley, 159 U. S. 103, 112; Patterson v. Colorado, 205 U. S. 454, 460-461; Tidal Oil Co. v. Flanagan, 263 U. S. 444, 450.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By (14 total)

  • Interstate Commerce Comm'n v. Am. Trucking Ass'ns, Inc., 467 U.S. 354 (U.S. 1984)
    …have involved cases of tariffs mistakenly filed with the Commission by carriers outside the Commission’s jurisdiction. See Acme Fast Freight, Inc., et al., Common Carrier Application, 17 M. C. C. 549(1939), sustained, 30 F. Supp. 968 (SDNY), aff’d, 309 U. S. 638 (1940) (per curiam); Mercer Valley R. Co. v. Pennsylvania R. Co., 69 I. C. C. 233 (1922). Only in 1978 did the Commission propose to nullify an effective tariff of a carrier within the Commission’s jurisdiction. National Assn, of Specialized Carrie…
  • United States v. Chicago Heights Trucking Co., 310 U.S. 344 (U.S. 1940)
    …Freight, Inc., Common Carrier Application, 8 M. C. C. 211. Interstate Commerce Comm’n v. Delaware, L. & W. R. Co., 220 U. S. 235. 8 M. C. C. 211, Acme Fast Freight, Inc. v. United States, 30 F. Supp. 968. Acme Fast Freight, Inc. v. United States, 309 U. S. 638. These arguments for sustaining the tariffs were all forcefully presented in the dissenting opinion of Chairman Eastman, concurred in by Commissioner Mahaffie. United States v. Louisville & Nashville R. Co., 235 U. S. 314, 320. Id. Swayne & Hoyt…
  • Mercury Motor Express, Inc. v. Brinke, 475 F.2d 1086 (5th Cir. 1973)
    …ld Goods Carriers’ Bureau v. United States, N.D.Cal.1968, 288 F.Supp. 641, 642, aff’d per curiam, 393 U.S. 265, 89 S.Ct. 477, 21 L.Ed.2d 426; see also Acme Fast Freight, Inc. v. United States, S.D.N.Y.1940, 30 F.Supp. 968, 969-971, aff’d per curiam, 309 U.S. 638, 60 S.Ct. 810, 84 L.Ed. 993. Freight forwarders are to be distinguished on the one hand from rail or pipe line carriers, water carriers, and motor carriers, which are expressly excluded from the statutory freight forwarder definition,2 and on the o…

Previewing 3 of 14 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw