SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, IN AND FOR THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ET AL.
v.
EVANS, BUILDING AND LOAN COMMISSIONER
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, IN AND FOR THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ET AL.
EVANS, BUILDING AND LOAN COMMISSIONER
309 U.S. 640
Supreme Court of the United States (1940)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is .dismissed for the want of a properly presented federal question. Godchaux Co. v. Estopinal, 251 U. S. 179; Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co., 261 U. S. 114, 117; Herndon v. Georgia, 295 U. S. 441, 443.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Fid. Sav. & Loan Ass'n v. Fed. Home Loan Bank Bd., 689 F.2d 803 (9th Cir. 1982)…reme Court, however, has broadly construed the statutory powers of the Commissioner. Evans v. Superior Court, 20 Cal.2d 186, 190-91, 124 P. 2d 820 (1942) (Evans II); Evans v. Superior Court, 14 Cal.2d 563, 572, 96 P. 2d 107 (1939), appeal dismissed, 309 U.S. 640, 60 S.Ct. 893, 84 L.Ed. 995 (1940) (Evans I); Wilson v. Superior Court, 2 Cal.2d 632, 635-37, 43 P. 2d 286 (1935). Recognizing the legislature’s intent to provide a comprehensive plan for supervising state savings and loans, Trede v. Superior Cour…
Authorities Cited
- Rooker v. Fid. Tr. Co., 261 U.S. 114 (U.S. 1923)
- Herndon v. Georgia, 295 U.S. 441 (U.S. 1935)
- Godchaux Co. v. Estopinal, 251 U.S. 179 (U.S. 1919)