BACARDI CORPORATION

v.

BONET, TREASURER, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Hansberry v. LEE, 311 U.S. 32 (U.S. 1940)
  …ondition precedent to thó validity of the agreement was res judicata, alleged and entered a decree for respondents. The Supreme Court of Illinois , affirmed. 372 Ill. 369; 24 N. E. 2d 37. We granted certiorari to resolve the constitutional question. 309 U. S. 652. [*39] The Supreme Court of Illinois, upon an examination of the record in Burke v. Kleiman, supra, found that that suit, in the Superior Court of Cook County, was brought by a landowner in the restricted area to enforce the agreement, which had bee…
• Fid. Union Tr. Co. v. Field, 311 U.S. 169 (U.S. 1940)
  …tute the complainant— was, entitled to recover. In so ruling, the court declined [*175] to follow contrary decisions of the Chancery Court of New Jersey. 108 F. 2d 521. In view of the importance of the question thus presented, we granted certiorari. 309 U. S. 652. In 1932, the legislature of New Jersey passed four statutes, in similar terms and approved on the same date, dealing with trust deposits in banks. The text of one of thése provisions is- set forth in the margin.1 Prior to these statutes, it had be…
• Bacardi Corp. of Am. v. Domenech, 311 U.S. 150 (U.S. 1940)