PORT OF SEATTLE

v.

FIDELITY & DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND

Citator

Cited By

• Boykin v. Huff, 121 F.2d 865 (D.C. Cir. 1941)
  …113, 45 S.Ct. 85, 69 L.Ed. 195; Mahler v. Eby, 1924, 264 U.S. 32, 44 S.Ct. 283, 68 L.Ed. 549; United States ex rel. Murphy v. Warden of Clinton Prison, D.C.N.D.N.Y.1939, 29 F.Supp. 486, affirmed, 2 Cir., 1940, 108 F. 2d 861, certiorari denied, 1940, 309 U.S. 661, 60 S.Ct. 583, 84 L.Ed. 1009. Ex parte Watkins, 1830, 3 Pet. 193, 7 L.Ed. 650; Ex parte Parks, 1876, 93 U.S. 18, 23 L.Ed. 787; In re Coy, 1888, 127. U.S. 731, 8 S.Ct. 1263, 32 L.Ed. 274; Pierce v. Creecy, 1908, 210 U.S. 387, 28 S.Ct. 714, 52 L.Ed.…
• The United States v. Yoshida Int'l, Inc., 526 F.2d 560 (C.C.P.A. 1975)
  …t perhaps inferentially in its reference to “the construction contended by the defendant.” For a judicial interpretation of the words “or otherwise,” see Dunham v. Omaha & Council Bluffs Street Ry. Co., 106 F. 2d 1, 3 (2nd Cir. 1939), cert. denied, 309 U.S. 661, 60 S.Ct. 513, 84 L.Ed. 1009 (1940). We note, also, the congressional use in § 5(b) of “or otherwise” after “through any agency that he may designate.” It would be difficult to hold, for example, that § 5(b) requires the President to use an “agency…
• Hawk v. Olson, 130 F.2d 910 (8th Cir. 1942)
  …Iowa, 8 Cir., 41 F. 2d 38, 39, 40; Reed v. Madden, 8 Cir., 87 F. 2d 846, 852; Palmer v. McCauley, 9 Cir., 103 F. 2d 300, 301; United States ex rel. Murphy v. Murphy, 2 Cir., 108 F. 2d 861, certiorari denied, Murphy v. Warden of Clinton State Prison, 309 U.S. 661, 60 S.Ct. 583, 84 L.Ed. 1009; In re Anderson, 9 Cir., 117 F. 2d 939; Id., 9 Cir., 118 F. 2d 750; Gebhart v. Amrine, 10 Cir., 117 F. 2d 995; Achtien v. Dowd, 7 Cir., 117 F. 2d 989, 994, 995; Davis v. Dowd, 7 Cir., 119 F. 2d 338; Kramer v. State of Ne…