CANTLEY, RECEIVER,

v.

ANDREWS ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Leif M. Hanson v. Ford Motor Co., 278 F.2d 586 (8th Cir. 1960)
  …ber Products Co., 308 U.S. 106, 115, 60 S.Ct. 1, 84 L.Ed. 110; Pettibone v. Cook County, Minnesota, 8 Cir., 120 F. 2d 850, 856; Andrews v. St. Louis Joint Stock Land Bank, 8 Cir., 107 F. 2d 462, 470, certiorari denied sub. nomine Cantley v. Andrews, 309 U.S. 667, 60 S.Ct. 592, 84 L.Ed. 1014; Tynan v. KSTP Incorporated, 247 Minn. 168, 176, 77 N.W. 2d 200, 205; Yellow Mfg. Acceptance Corp. v. Handler, 249 Minn. 539, 542, 83 N.W. 2d 103, 106; Kobler v. Heins, 189 Minn. 213, 216, 248 N.W. 698, 700. . This lang…
• Whiting Stoker Co. v. Chicago Stoker Corp., 171 F.2d 248 (7th Cir. 1948)
  …rties do not agree upon their proper construction. National Pigments & Chemical Co. v. C. K. Williams & Co., 8 Cir., 94 F. 2d 792; Andrews v. St. Louis Joint Stock Land Bank of St. Louis, 8 Cir., 107 F. 2d 462, certiorari denied Cantley v. Andrews, 309 U.S. 667, 60 S.Ct. 592, 84 L.Ed. 1014, rehearing denied, Id., 309 U.S. 697, 60 S.Ct. 711, 84 L.Ed. 1036. An ambiguous contract is one capable of being understood in more senses than one; an agreement obscure in meaning, through indefiniteness of expression,…
• Vreeland v. Fed. Power Comm'n, 528 F.2d 1343 (5th Cir. 1976)
  …t is not rendered ambiguous by the mere fact that the parties may not agree upon the proper construction to be given it, Andrews v. St. Louis Joint Stock Land Bank of St. Louis, 8 Cir. 1939, 107 F. 2d 462, cert. denied, sub nom., Cantley v. Andrews, 309 U.S. 667, 60 S.Ct. 592, 84 L.Ed. 1014. The intention of the contracting parties is to be gathered from a survey of the instrument as a whole, not from its separate provisions, Shuford Development Co. v. Chysler Corp., 5 Cir. 1971, 449 F. 2d 429; Pickren v. U…