CONSIDINE

v.

PENNSYLVANIA

Citator

Cited By

• Whiting Stoker Co. v. Chicago Stoker Corp., 171 F.2d 248 (7th Cir. 1948)
  …rties do not agree upon their proper construction. National Pigments & Chemical Co. v. C. K. Williams & Co., 8 Cir., 94 F. 2d 792; Andrews v. St. Louis Joint Stock Land Bank of St. Louis, 8 Cir., 107 F. 2d 462, certiorari denied Cantley v. Andrews, 309 U.S. 667, 60 S.Ct. 592, 84 L.Ed. 1014, rehearing denied, Id., 309 U.S. 697, 60 S.Ct. 711, 84 L.Ed. 1036. An ambiguous contract is one capable of being understood in more senses than one; an agreement obscure in meaning, through indefiniteness of expression,…
• Vreeland v. Fed. Power Comm'n, 528 F.2d 1343 (5th Cir. 1976)
  …t is not rendered ambiguous by the mere fact that the parties may not agree upon the proper construction to be given it, Andrews v. St. Louis Joint Stock Land Bank of St. Louis, 8 Cir. 1939, 107 F. 2d 462, cert. denied, sub nom., Cantley v. Andrews, 309 U.S. 667, 60 S.Ct. 592, 84 L.Ed. 1014. The intention of the contracting parties is to be gathered from a survey of the instrument as a whole, not from its separate provisions, Shuford Development Co. v. Chysler Corp., 5 Cir. 1971, 449 F. 2d 429; Pickren v. U…
• Page Commc'ns Eng'rs, Inc. v. Fkoehlke, 475 F.2d 994 (D.C. Cir. 1973)
  …a memorandum opinion explaining its reasons for refusing to assess damages against the plaintiff. Citing Russell v. Farley, 105 U.S. 433, 26 L.Ed. 1060 (1881), and Greenwood County v. Duke Power Co., 107 F. 2d 484, 489 (4th Cir. 1939), cert. denied, 309 U.S. 667, 60 S.Ct. 608, 84 L.Ed. 1014 (1940), the court held: * * * this Court has the discretion, in the interests of equity and justice, to rule that no liability be imposed on the injunction bond -X- -X- * -X- Continuing, the court said in part: This w…