STEELMAN ET AL.

v.

WICHITA FALLS & SOUTHERN RAILWAY CO.

Citator

Cited By

• Missouri-Kansas Pipe Line Co. v. United States, 312 U.S. 502 (U.S. 1941)
  …its own behalf on the score of its ownership of more than forty percent of Panhandle’s stock, the district court denied the motions. Appeals from these denials were dismissed by the circuit court of appeals, 108 F. 2d 614, and we denied certiorari, 309 U. S. 687. The denials are now urged as res judicata. But they were a rejection of Mokan’s attempt to intervene in its own behalf. In neither instance was the relief denied deemed a mode of enforcing Panhandle’s rights under Sections IV and V of the decree. T…
• Scott v. Beams, 122 F.2d 777 (10th Cir. 1941)
  …. 2d 128; Bowles v. United States, 4 Cir., 50 F. 2d 848, certiorari denied 284 U.S. 648, 52 S.Ct. 29, 76 L.Ed. 550; Bommarito v. United States, 8 Cir., 61 F. 2d 355; Davis v. Securities and Exchange Commission, 7 Cir., 109 F. 2d 6, certiorari denied 309 U.S. 687, 60 S.Ct. 889, 84 L.Ed. 1030. One remaining argument merits attention. It is urged with emphasis that the trial, including the making of findings of fact, failed to reflect that calm and deliberate consideration of the evidence and that judicial im…
• United States v. Am. Soc'y OF Composers, 317 F.2d 90 (2d Cir. 1963)
  …ot its business. When an issue as to its role in appeals under the Expediting Act has been squarely presented, the Third Circuit has made its position plain. Missouri-Kansas Pipe Line Co. v. United States, 108 F. 2d 614 (3 Cir., 1939), cert. denied, 309 U.S. 687, 60 S.Ct. 887, 84 L.Ed. 1030 (1940). Appellants’ reliance on the statement in Magee-Hale is thus answered a fortiori by what Chief Justice Marshall said long ago: “No question was made, in that case, as to the jurisdiction. It passed sub silentio,…