PET MILK CO.

v.

GRAY

Citator

Cited By

• McFERREN v. Cnty. Bd. OF Educ. OF Fayette Cnty., 455 F.2d 199 (6th Cir. 1972)
  …ndment was adopted. Baltimore & Carolina Line, Inc. v. Redman, 295 U.S. 654, 657, 55 S.Ct. 890, 79 L.Ed. 1636; Welch v. Tennessee Valley Authority, 108 F. 2d 95, 98-99, C.A. 6th, cert. denied, Welch v. United States ex rel. and for Use of T. V. A., 309 U.S. 688, 60 S.Ct. 889, 84 L.Ed. 1030. Thus, it has no application to cases where recovery of money damages is an incident to an action seeking equitable relief, even though damages might have been recovered in an action at law. It does not apply where the…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Kinter v. United States, 156 F.2d 5 (3d Cir. 1946)
  …s shown that the rule is reasonably satisfactory.” It has been said that “sales at arms length of similar property are the best evidence of market value.” Welch v. Tennessee Valley Authority, 6 Cir., 1939, 108 F. 2d 95, 101, certiorari denied 1939, 309 U.S. 688, 60 S.Ct. 889, 84 L.Ed. 1030. Even where there have been no sales of similar property in the vicinity upon which a basis of valuation might be predicated, the quest is still for “market value.” This may be more or less than the owner’s investment in…