LOVING ET AL., A COPARTNERSHIP,

v.

UNITED STATES ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Carolina Freight Carriers Corp., 315 U.S. 475 (U.S. 1942)
  …n, 305 U. S. 263, 266. Substantial, as [*481] distinguished from incidental, sporadic, or infrequent, service is required. Substantial service actually rendered may have been confined to narrow limits. Loving v. United States, 32 F. Supp. 464, aff’d 310 U. S. 609. Ability to render the service throughout the wide reaches of the territory, which the applicant professed to be willing to serve, may not have existed. Furthermore, the characteristics of the transportation service rendered are relevant' to the te…
• Holiday Tours, Inc. v. Wash. Metro. Area Transit Comm'n, 352 F.2d 672 (D.C. Cir. 1965)
  …are all matters which should be inquired into and appraised.” Moore v. United States, 41 F.Supp. 786, at 791 (D.Minn.1941), aff’d, 316 U.S. 642, 62 S.Ct. 1036, 86 L.Ed. 1128 (1942). . Loving v. United States, 32 F.Supp. 464, 466 (W.D.Okla.), aff’d, 310 U.S. 609, 60 S.Ct. 898, 84 L.Ed. 1387 (1940); Moore v. United States, supra note 5, 41 F. [*677] Supp. at 792; Thomson v. United States, 321 U.S. 19, 24-25, 64 S.Ct. 392, 88 L.Ed. 513 (1944); O’Malley v. United States, 38 F.Supp. 1 (D.Minn.1941); Kline v. Un…

Authorities Cited

• Interstate Commerce Comm'n v. Union Pac. R.R. Co., 222 U.S. 541 (U.S. 1912)
• McDONALD v. Thompson, 305 U.S. 263 (U.S. 1938)
• The Los Angeles Switching Case, 234 U.S. 294 (U.S. 1914)
• United States v. Maher, 307 U.S. 148 (U.S. 1939)