RHODES

v.

IOWA

Citator

Cited By

• Curtis v. Rives, 123 F.2d 936 (D.C. Cir. 1941)
  …Neither of these matters was within the issues in the habeas corpus hearing, and there is no finding of fact in respect of either of them. Therefore we cannot consider them. Crockett v. Johnston, 9 Cir., 1940, 109 F. 2d 444, certiorari denied, 1940, 310 U.S. 626, 60 S.Ct. 975, 84 L.Ed. 1397; Dea Hong v. Nagle, 9 Cir., 1924, 300 F. 727. The record shows no loss of jurisdiction, through denial of a constitutional right, to convict and sentence the defendant in the criminal trial. The order of the trial court…
• Stamps v. United States, 436 F.2d 1059 (9th Cir. 1971)
  …That issue was not raised in the District Court. Suggs v. Wilson, 403 F. 2d 52 (9th Cir.1968); Davis v. Rhay, 256 F. 2d 617 (9th Cir.1958); Watkins v. Duffy, 197 F. 2d 816 (9th Cir.1952); Crockett v. Johnston, 109 F. 2d 444 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 310 U.S. 626, 60 S.Ct. 975, 84 L.Ed. 1397 (1940). Affirmed. . Should the Supreme Court ultimately decide that Chimel is to be retroactively applied, there would of course be no bar to Stamps reinstituting his claim in a new petition. The Supreme Court heard ar…