MCCAMPBELL

v.

WARRICH CORP. ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (21 total)

• Williams v. North Carolina, 325 U.S. 226 (U.S. 1945)
  …which Job wrestled in his suffering. Cf. Tilt v. Kelsey, 207 U. S. 43; Iowa v. Slimmer, 248 U. S. 115; Worcester County Trust Co, v. Riley, 302 U. S. 292; Texas v. Florida, 306 U. S. 398; Sweeney v. District of Columbia, 113 F. 2d 25, cert. denied, 310 U. S. 631. Compare District of Columbia v. Murphy, 314 U. S. 441, with District of Columbia v. Pace, 320 U. S. 698. See 121 A. L. R. 1200; Tweed and Sargent, Death and Taxes Are Certain — But What of Domicile? (1939) 53 Harv. L. Rev. 68. The residence requir…
• Dist. of Columbia v. Murphy, 314 U.S. 441 (U.S. 1941)
  …domiciled in the District of Columbia, believing that it was compelled to do so by the decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia in Sweeney v. District of Columbia, 72 App. D. C. 30, 113 F. 2d 25, certiorari denied, 310 U. S. 631. The respondent in No. 59 lived in the District of Columbia for twenty-six years after coming here from Pennsylvania in 1914 to accept a clerical position of indefinite tenure under Civil Service in the Patent Office. He was then on a year’s leave…
• United States v. Crockett, 514 F.2d 64 (5th Cir. 1975)
  …right, entitled to receive the list of jurors prior to the day of trial. The time at which defendants may be given a jury list is left to the sound discretion of the trial court.” Spivey v. United States, 109 F. 2d 181, 185 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 310 U.S. 631, 60 S.Ct. 1079, 84 L.Ed. 1401 (1940). Bound by the Ford-Spivey line of cases, we find no error in the trial court’s denial of the motion for a new trial. The contention that a partial verdict of guilty was in effect directed when the trial court fa…