DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

v.

SWEENEY

Citator

Cited By (20 total)

• Williams v. North Carolina, 325 U.S. 226 (U.S. 1945)
  …which Job wrestled in his suffering. Cf. Tilt v. Kelsey, 207 U. S. 43; Iowa v. Slimmer, 248 U. S. 115; Worcester County Trust Co, v. Riley, 302 U. S. 292; Texas v. Florida, 306 U. S. 398; Sweeney v. District of Columbia, 113 F. 2d 25, cert. denied, 310 U. S. 631. Compare District of Columbia v. Murphy, 314 U. S. 441, with District of Columbia v. Pace, 320 U. S. 698. See 121 A. L. R. 1200; Tweed and Sargent, Death and Taxes Are Certain — But What of Domicile? (1939) 53 Harv. L. Rev. 68. The residence requir…
• United States v. Crockett, 514 F.2d 64 (5th Cir. 1975)
  …right, entitled to receive the list of jurors prior to the day of trial. The time at which defendants may be given a jury list is left to the sound discretion of the trial court.” Spivey v. United States, 109 F. 2d 181, 185 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 310 U.S. 631, 60 S.Ct. 1079, 84 L.Ed. 1401 (1940). Bound by the Ford-Spivey line of cases, we find no error in the trial court’s denial of the motion for a new trial. The contention that a partial verdict of guilty was in effect directed when the trial court fa…
• Rice v. Sioux City Mem'l Park Cemetery, Inc., 349 U.S. 70 (U.S. 1955)
  …dgment of the Supreme Court of Iowa is vacated and the writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted. It is so ordered. Mr. Justice Harlan took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. Cf. District of Columbia v. Sweeney, 310 U. S. 631, where cer-tiorari was denied “in view of the fact that the tax is laid under a statute which has been repealed and the question is therefore not of public importance.” United States v. Rimer, 220 U. S. 547; Furness, Withy & Co. v. Yang-Tsze Ins. A…