MARYLAND CASUALTY CO.

v.

TOWN OF RIVER JUNCTION ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Sapperstein, 312 F.2d 694 (4th Cir. 1963)
  …chery of a carnal nature * * Athanasaw v. United States, 227. U.S. 326, 33 S.Ct. 285, 57 L.Ed. 528 (1913) : cf., Cleveland v. United States, 329 U.S. 14, 67 S.Ct. 13, 91 L.Ed. 12 (1946); United States v. Lewis, 110 F. 2d 460 (7th Cir.), cert. denied 310 U.S. 634, 60 S.Ct. 1077, 84 L.Ed. 1404 (1940). The second contention relates to the victims’ testimony concerning statements made to them by Austrew upon their arrival in Illinois that their jobs entailed prostitution. As further indication that the enterpr…
• The Home Indem. Co. v. The United States, 376 F.2d 890 (Ct. Cl. 1967)
  …security held by the Government for the protection of itself and the surety “just as though the contractor had pledged so many Liberty Bonds.” Town of River Junction v. Maryland Cas. Co., 110 F. 2d 278, 281, 134 A.L.R. 727 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 310 U.S. 634, 60 S.Ct. 1077, 84 L.Ed. 1404 (1940). The defendant contends quite correctly that the surety’s right is only a potential one which does not become an actuality until the surety satisfies a debt of its principal. However, the surety’s rights of subr…
• Am. Airlines, Inc. v. Ulen (two cases), 186 F.2d 529 (D.C. Cir. 1949)
  …arrier for each passenger was limited to the sum of 125,000 francs. It is agreed by the parties to this appeal that the figure above is the equivalent, in United States currency, of $8,291.87. . 5 Cir., 1940, 110 F. 2d 278, certiorari denied, 1940, 310 U.S. 634, 60 S.Ct. 1077, 84 L.Ed. 1404. . D.C., 7 F.R.D. 371, 375. . Kohler et al. v. Jacobs et al., 5 Cir., 1943, 138 F. 2d 440. See also, Holtzoffi, New Federal Procedure and the Courts (1940), pages 143 — 4, wherein answers to interrogatories are expres…