LADINSKY ET AL.

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (13 total)

• Seaboard Coastline R.R. Co. v. Artis Dennard, 399 So. 2d 490 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)
  …s error the trial court’s refusal to admit Rules and Regulations of the Mechanical Department.2 He contends that a violation of these rules constitutes negligence, citing Atchison, Top. & S. F. Ry. v. Ballard, 108 F. 2d 768 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 310 U.S. 646, 60 S.Ct. 1096, 84 L.Ed. 1413 (1940). The point of appellee’s argument is dulled by the fact that the court admitted some of the rules while sustaining objections to others. We therefore reject that argument. The order granting a new trial is rever…
• Atl. Coast Line R.R. Co. v. Kammerer, 239 F.2d 115 (5th Cir. 1956)
  …real difference,, nor any reason, Seagraves v. Wallace, 5 Cir., 69 F. 2d 163; Commercial National Bank in [*117] Shreveport v. Connolly, 5 Cir., 176 F. 2d 1004; Atchison T. & S. F. Railway Company v. Ballard, 5 Cir., 108 F. 2d 768, certiorari denied 310 U.S. 646, 60 S.Ct. 1096, 84 L.Ed. 1413, to alter our prior holdings that plainly recognized that, the record remaining similar, it was a case for the jury. Young Kammerer was driving north on Albany Street which runs north and south. The approach from the s…
• Hal F. Rachal and Norman F. Hoffman v. Allen, 376 F.2d 999 (5th Cir. 1967)
  …rt. den. 354 U.S. 939, 77 S.Ct. 1397, 1 L.Ed.2d 1536; Lincoln Nat’l Life Insurance Co. v. Roosth, 5th Cir. 1962, 306 F. 2d 110; cert. den. 372 U.S. 912, 83 S.Ct. 726, 9 L.Ed.2d 720; Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. v. Ballard, 108 F. 2d 768, 772, cert. den. 310 U.S. 646, 60 S.Ct. 1096, 84 L.Ed. 1413. The verdict should be reinstated. Although this Court has no obligation to reconsider its prior ruling, it may do so. See Lumberman’s Mutual Casualty Co. v. Wright, supra, 322 F. 2d at 763. The Secretary urges that if…