LEWIS, EXECUTRIX, ET AL.
v.
FONTENOT, COLLECTOR, ET AL.; LEWIS, TESTAMENTARY EXECUTRIX, ET AL. V. UNITED STATES ET AL.; AND LEWIS, TESTAMENTARY EXECUTRIX, ET AL. V. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE ET AL.

U.S. | 1940-12-09
Nos. 176; No. 177; No. 178
311 U.S. 621 Supreme Court of the United States (1940) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • …, the district court properly dismissed the action without prejudice and assessed costs against the plaintiffs.2 See, e. g., Moore v. Mitchell, 281 U.S. 18, 50 S.Ct. 175, 74 L.Ed. 673 (1930); Lewis v. Fontenot, 110 F. 2d 65 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 311 U.S. 621, 61 S.Ct. 315, 85 L.Ed. 394 (1940); Mann v. De Moss, 323 F.Supp. 1126 (S.D.Iowa 1971).3 Affirmed. . The Honorable John K. Regan, Senior United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri. . The main reason for this appeal appears t…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw