ARMOUR & COMPANY

v.

ALTON RAILROAD CO. ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Guilder v. State, 899 So. 2d 412 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005)
  …ts must apply a statute as they find it, leaving to the legislature the correction of assorted inconsistencies and inequalities in its operation.’ ” State v. Aiuppa, 298 So. 2d 391, 404 (Fla.1974) (citing McClain v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 311 U.S. 627, 61 S.Ct. 373, 85 L.Ed. 319 (1940)). As the supreme court has already declined to revisit the issue and the legislature has also failed to take issue with the interpretation given to section 934.03 by the supreme court, we affirm under the precede…
• Armour & Co. v. Alton R.R. Co., 312 U.S. 195 (U.S. 1941)
  …orrect in its contention that under the facts of this case the railroads must deliver its shipments of livestock at such a location and in such a manner that it need pay no “yardage charge” to the Stock Yards Company. The case is here on certiorari (311 U. S. 627) from the Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit,2 which affirmed a District Court order dismissing Armour’s complaint against the railroads.3 The ground on which the Circuit Court affirmed was that the issues involved presented administrative pro…